Home » Civil Engineering » Waste Water Engineering

Process selection for a large city: For treating municipal sewage at metropolitan scale, which process train is generally recommended?

Difficulty: Medium

Correct Answer: Primary sedimentation followed by activated sludge (secondary) treatment

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:

Large cities require robust, scalable, and controllable wastewater treatment capable of meeting stringent effluent standards. The process must handle variable flows and loads while allowing energy-efficient operation and nutrient removal options.


Given Data / Assumptions:

  • Metropolitan-scale flows with significant industrial and commercial contributions.
  • Regulatory compliance for BOD, TSS, and potentially nutrients.
  • Existing best practices in urban wastewater treatment.


Concept / Approach:

Primary sedimentation removes settleable solids and reduces organic loading to the biological stage. The activated sludge process (ASP) offers high-rate biological oxidation with process control (MLSS, SRT, DO), modularity (plug-flow, step-feed), and the ability to integrate nitrification-denitrification and biological phosphorus removal. Trickling filters or Imhoff tanks are typically suited to smaller plants or specific contexts and offer less process control at very large scales.


Step-by-Step Solution:

Select primary sedimentation to reduce TSS and protect downstream aeration.Choose activated sludge for secondary treatment to achieve low effluent BOD/TSS and enable nutrient removal if needed.Provide tertiary polishing where regulations require further reduction.


Verification / Alternative check:

Most large municipal WWTPs worldwide use some variant of ASP (conventional, extended aeration, step-feed, oxidation ditches, SBRs) after primary clarification, validating the selection.


Why Other Options Are Wrong:

  • Imhoff + low-rate trickling filters: Viable for small/medium towns; scaling and control are limited for megacities.
  • High-rate trickling filters only: Can be used, but control and footprint for nutrient removal are less favorable than ASP at very large scales.
  • None of these / Septic tanks: Not appropriate for metropolitan systems.


Common Pitfalls:

  • Underestimating the need for process control, redundancy, and flexibility in large plants.
  • Ignoring sludge handling (thickening, digestion, dewatering) integral to the overall train.


Final Answer:

Primary sedimentation followed by activated sludge (secondary) treatment

← Previous Question Next Question→

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion