Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: Triaxial compression test (UU/CU/CD as required)
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
Saturated clays exhibit drainage-dependent behavior. Selecting the correct shear test ensures that drainage, confining pressure, and stress path replicate field conditions so that the measured shear strength (cohesion intercept and friction angle) is meaningful for design of foundations, slopes, and excavations.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
The triaxial compression test is preferred because it allows control of drainage (UU, CU, CD), measurement of pore pressure (CU), and application of isotropic/anisotropic confining stress to simulate in-situ stress paths. Direct shear is simple but enforces a predetermined failure plane and provides limited control of drainage uniformity in clays. Unconfined compression is quick for saturated clays but gives only one undrained point with zero confinement and no control of drainage or pore pressure.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Verification / Alternative check:
Compare strengths from UU, CU, and CD on the same clay: trends in friction angle and cohesion are consistent with critical state and consolidation history, supporting triaxial suitability.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Common Pitfalls:
Using direct shear data for complex stress paths; extrapolating UC test results to confined conditions; ignoring saturation and rate effects.
Final Answer:
Triaxial compression test (UU/CU/CD as required)
Discussion & Comments