Shear strength testing of saturated clays: For evaluating the shear strength parameters of a saturated clay sample in geotechnical engineering, which laboratory test is most appropriate and generally recommended?

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: Triaxial compression test (UU/CU/CD as required)

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
Saturated clays exhibit drainage-dependent behavior. Selecting the correct shear test ensures that drainage, confining pressure, and stress path replicate field conditions so that the measured shear strength (cohesion intercept and friction angle) is meaningful for design of foundations, slopes, and excavations.


Given Data / Assumptions:

  • Specimen is saturated cohesive soil (clay).
  • Engineer can control drainage and consolidation during testing.
  • Design may require undrained (short-term) or drained (long-term) strength.


Concept / Approach:
The triaxial compression test is preferred because it allows control of drainage (UU, CU, CD), measurement of pore pressure (CU), and application of isotropic/anisotropic confining stress to simulate in-situ stress paths. Direct shear is simple but enforces a predetermined failure plane and provides limited control of drainage uniformity in clays. Unconfined compression is quick for saturated clays but gives only one undrained point with zero confinement and no control of drainage or pore pressure.


Step-by-Step Solution:

Identify the desired field condition (short-term undrained vs long-term drained).Choose triaxial mode: UU for short-term total-stress, CU with pore pressure for effective-stress undrained, CD for fully drained long-term.Benefit: obtain complete stress–strain and strength parameters with flexibility on drainage and measurement of pore pressures.


Verification / Alternative check:
Compare strengths from UU, CU, and CD on the same clay: trends in friction angle and cohesion are consistent with critical state and consolidation history, supporting triaxial suitability.


Why Other Options Are Wrong:

  • Direct shear: fixed failure plane, limited drainage control; useful but not generally “most appropriate.”
  • Unconfined compression: zero confining pressure, only undrained; screening test.
  • “All equally suitable” ignores drainage and stress-path control needs.


Common Pitfalls:
Using direct shear data for complex stress paths; extrapolating UC test results to confined conditions; ignoring saturation and rate effects.


Final Answer:
Triaxial compression test (UU/CU/CD as required)

More Questions from Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion