Cash-flow diagram conventions in engineering economy: which statements correctly describe the sign and timing rules used on standard diagrams?

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: All of these

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
Cash-flow diagrams are the grammar of engineering economy. They standardize how we display amount, direction, and timing so that formulas and factors can be applied consistently across problems and software tools.


Given Data / Assumptions:

  • Discrete, equal-length periods (years unless otherwise noted).
  • Arrows placed exactly at period boundaries or at Time 0.
  • Consistent sign convention for inflows and outflows.


Concept / Approach:
Using consistent conventions prevents misapplication of factors (e.g., P/A, F/A, P/F). Time 0 is the present; end-of-period cash flows align at integers (1, 2, …). Up arrows denote money received; down arrows denote money paid. These visual rules encode annuities, gradients, and single sums unambiguously.


Step-by-Step Solution:

Draw the timeline with Time 0 at the left, then 1, 2, … n.Place deposits/receipts as up arrows and payments as down arrows.Note whether series are ordinary (end-of-period) or due (beginning-of-period) based on arrow placement.


Verification / Alternative check:

Recreate the same cash flows in a spreadsheet and confirm that NPV/IRR results match the diagram when using proper timing.


Why Other Options Are Wrong:

Each individual statement is correct; only the aggregate option captures the full convention set.


Common Pitfalls:

Shifting cash flows by one period accidentally; confusing ordinary annuity with annuity due.


Final Answer:

All of these

More Questions from Engineering Economy

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion