Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: Generally
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
This question probes everyday physics (Newton’s laws) and how human bodies respond to sudden acceleration of a vehicle. It requires judging typicality rather than logical necessity.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
By inertia (Newton’s first law), a body at rest resists change in motion. When the car accelerates forward, the seat pushes the boy’s lower back forward; relative to the car’s frame, his upper body tends to “lag,” giving the sensation/appearance of bending backwards.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Verification / Alternative check:
Real-world exceptions exist: if the boy anticipates and tenses forward, braces with hands, or if seatbelts/child restraints limit motion, the observable lean can be reduced or absent. Hence it is not “always.”
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Always overstates, ignoring cases with restraints or anticipatory bracing. Sometimes understates; the effect is common. Never contradicts basic inertia.
Common Pitfalls:
Confusing the frame of reference (car vs. ground) and misreading “generally” vs. “always.”
Final Answer:
Generally
Discussion & Comments