In C, what is the output of the following pointer-to-pointer calculation? Pay attention to operator precedence and tokenization.
#include
int power(int );
int main()
{
int a = 5, aa; / Suppose &a is 1000 (illustrative only) /
aa = &a;
a = power(&aa);
printf("%d
", a);
return 0;
}
int power(int **ptr)
{
int b;
b = ptrptr; / parsed as (**ptr) * (**ptr) /
return b;
}
-
A5
-
B25
-
C125
-
DGarbage value
-
ENone of the above
Answer
Correct Answer: 25
Explanation
Introduction / Context:This problem probes your understanding of how C tokenizes and parses expressions containing both the dereference operator () and the multiplication operator () with pointer-to-pointer types. The sequence ptr*ptr looks confusing but is valid and important to decode correctly.
Given Data / Assumptions:
ptris of typeint **.*ptrhas typeintand points toa.**ptris the integer valuea, initially 5.
Concept / Approach:In C, lexing splits ptrptr as (*ptr) * ( *ptr), which equals (**ptr) * (**ptr). There is no ***ptr here because the types would not match; instead, you have a multiplication between two dereferenced values, each yielding the same integer.
Step-by-Step Solution:Compute *ptr → 5.Compute *ptr → dereference the int * to get 5 again.Multiply: 5 * 5 = 25.Return 25; assign back to a; print 25.
Verification / Alternative check:Add parentheses explicitly as b = (**ptr) * (**ptr); which compiles and clearly yields 25, confirming the analysis.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:5 would correspond to a single dereference, not a product. 125 or a garbage value would require different operations or undefined behavior; the given code is well-defined with valid pointers.
Common Pitfalls:Reading the token stream as ***ptr (which would be a type error here) or thinking multiplication applies to a pointer value directly. Both operands are ints after dereferencing.
Final Answer:25