Mortars for Brickwork – Typical lime:sand proportions used in construction For general brick masonry work, which of the following lime–sand mortar proportions (lime:sand by volume) is commonly adopted in practice?

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: 1:3

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
Lime mortars remain relevant for heritage, low-rise, and breathable masonry. The proportion of lime to sand controls workability, strength gain, permeability, and compatibility with clay bricks. A commonly taught proportion for general brickwork is 1:3 (lime:sand) by volume for fat lime mortars, with adjustments based on lime type and sand grading.


Given Data / Assumptions:

  • Use of fat (non-hydraulic) lime unless specified otherwise.
  • Clean, well-graded sand.
  • General brick masonry, not high-strength structural concrete.


Concept / Approach:

Mortar proportioning balances binder and aggregate so that the mix fills joints, adheres to units, and cures without excessive shrinkage. Too rich (1:1, 1:2) increases cost and shrinkage; too lean (1:4, 1:5) reduces cohesion and early strength. A 1:3 mix provides a practical middle ground frequently cited in textbooks and schedules for lime mortars in brickwork.


Step-by-Step Solution:

Identify typical range for lime mortars: 1:2 to 1:3 for fat limes.Select the most standard classroom/practice value: 1:3.Confirm that leaner mixes are reserved for non-loadbearing or rendering, and richer mixes for special finishes.


Verification / Alternative check:

Schedules of rates and handbooks list 1:3 as a prevalent proportion; site trials fine-tune water content and sand grading.


Why Other Options Are Wrong:

1:1 and 1:2 are unnecessarily rich for general brickwork; 1:4 or 1:5 can be too weak or porous for structural joints without additives or hydraulic lime.


Common Pitfalls:

Confusing lime mortar with cement–lime or pure cement mortars; not accounting for lime type (fat vs hydraulic) and sand grading.


Final Answer:

1:3

More Questions from Building Construction

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion