Difficulty: Hard
Correct Answer: T
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
This is a multi-step family-relation puzzle involving six people and role counts such as "two fathers" and "three brothers". These problems are common in banking and SSC exams because they test whether you can integrate explicit relationships with numerical constraints on family roles, without contradicting any clue.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
We first use the direct parent–child relationships to determine generations: grandparents, parents and children. Then we assign genders and marital links consistent with the clues. Finally, we check the counts: exactly two people must be fathers, exactly three must be in the role of brothers, and there must be exactly one mother. Any arrangement that violates these counts must be rejected, and the arrangement that works will reveal who the mother is.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Verification / Alternative check:
Try to make any other person the mother. If R were the mother, she could not also be described as U's sister. If Q were the mother, it would contradict the fact that Q is a brother. Making S the mother contradicts "S is the father of P". Therefore, the only consistent choice is T as the mother, with T married to P.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
S is explicitly stated to be a father, not a mother.
Q is clearly male and a brother of T's husband, so Q cannot be the lone mother.
R is in the children's generation as the sister of U, not the parent of U.
Common Pitfalls:
Candidates often ignore the numerical constraints and stop as soon as they find any arrangement that fits some of the relations. However, all conditions must be satisfied simultaneously: two fathers, three brothers and exactly one mother. Always verify the counts after building a tentative family tree, and adjust assumptions about gender (like U's gender) only in ways that respect every clue.
Final Answer:
The mother in the group is T.
Discussion & Comments