In bioprocess hydrodynamics, why is the Kolmogorov microscale (eddy size) important when considering shear exposure of cells or particles?

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: All of the above

Explanation:


Introduction:
Turbulent flows contain a spectrum of eddy sizes that transfer energy from large to progressively smaller scales. The Kolmogorov microscale marks the lower end of this cascade where viscous forces dominate and kinetic energy is dissipated. For shear-sensitive cells or particles, comparing their size to this smallest eddy provides a practical criterion for anticipating mechanical stress and potential damage.


Given Data / Assumptions:

  • Turbulence exists in the reactor due to agitation and/or aeration.
  • Cells or particles have a characteristic diameter that can be estimated.
  • Energy dissipation rate influences the Kolmogorov scale.


Concept / Approach:
If cell or particle sizes approach the Kolmogorov microscale, they experience steep velocity gradients across their bodies, raising shear and normal stresses. This can rupture membranes, detach cells from carriers, or fragment fungal hyphae. Understanding this scale helps in setting impeller speed, selecting spargers, and deciding whether low-shear reactors (for example, airlifts) are preferable.


Step-by-Step Solution:

1) Estimate energy dissipation rate from power input and volume.2) Compute Kolmogorov scale qualitatively; smaller scale implies harsher microeddies.3) Compare cell or particle diameter with this scale.4) If size ≥ microscale, anticipate higher shear exposure and consider mitigation.5) Adjust operating conditions to increase microscale (lower dissipation) or add shear protectants.


Verification / Alternative check:
Empirical observation of damage thresholds often correlates with calculated microscale trends across scales, supporting the practical value of this comparison in design and troubleshooting.


Why Other Options Are Wrong:

  • Each individual statement is correct but incomplete alone; the comprehensive answer is that all apply.


Common Pitfalls:
Using only bulk shear rate as a proxy; turbulent microeddies determine local stress. Ignoring aeration effects can underestimate dissipation near gas dispersion zones.


Final Answer:
All of the above

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion