For a design speed of 60 km/h on a two-lane road, what is the absolute minimum radius of a horizontal curve as per standard highway design relationships?

Introduction / Context:
The minimum radius of a horizontal curve depends on design speed V, maximum super-elevation e_max, and allowable side friction f. The “absolute minimum” radius corresponds to adopting the limiting values of e and f permitted by design practice for safety and comfort.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Design speed V = 60 km/h.
• Use standard relation: e + f = V^2 / (225 * R), with V in km/h and R in m.
• Adopt customary limiting values (typical exam usage): e_max ≈ 0.07 and f ≈ 0.05–0.06 for conservative absolute minimum tables.

Concept / Approach:
Rearrange the relation to R = V^2 / [225 * (e + f)]. With V = 60 km/h, V^2 = 3600. Taking e + f ≈ 0.122 (for example e = 0.07 and f ≈ 0.052) yields R ≈ 3600 / (225 * 0.122) ≈ 131 m, a commonly cited absolute minimum for exam problems at 60 km/h.

Step-by-Step Solution:
Write governing equation: e + f = V^2 / (225 * R).Substitute V = 60 ⇒ V^2 = 3600.Assume limiting e + f ≈ 0.122 (e.g., e = 0.07, f = 0.052).Compute R ≈ 3600 / (225 * 0.122) ≈ 131 m.

Verification / Alternative check:
At larger R (e.g., 210 m), the needed e + f reduces substantially; thus 131 m indeed represents a tighter, near-limit curve using the adopted maxima for e and f.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:

• 210 m and 360 m: represent more comfortable/larger radii than the absolute minimum at 60 km/h.
• None of these: incorrect since 131 m is a standard exam-table value.

Common Pitfalls:
Confusing “absolute minimum” (using limiting e and f) with “ruling minimum” (more comfortable limits); mixing units when using the 225 factor.

Final Answer:
131 m