Difficulty: Medium
Correct Answer: All of the above statements describe why viruses are considered nonliving.
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
Viruses occupy a unique position at the border between living and nonliving matter. They can replicate and evolve, but only inside host cells, and they lack many features that are typical of living organisms. Exam questions often ask why viruses are described as nonliving or as obligate intracellular parasites. This question brings together several key properties that distinguish viruses from normal cellular life.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
Living cells share certain core properties: they have cellular structure, carry out their own metabolism and can grow and reproduce using their own machinery. Viruses lack these features. A typical virus particle consists mainly of nucleic acid enclosed in a protein coat and sometimes a lipid envelope. Outside a host cell, a virus shows no metabolism, does not grow, does not respond to stimuli and cannot synthesise proteins or nucleic acids by itself. It must enter a host cell and hijack the host machinery to replicate. Because of this dependence and lack of independent cellular functions, viruses are often described as nonliving or as biological particles rather than full organisms.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Step 1: Consider metabolism. Living cells carry out many chemical reactions such as respiration, synthesis of molecules and waste removal. Viruses do not show such metabolic activity outside a host cell.
Step 2: Consider cellular structure. Viruses do not have cytoplasm, organelles or a cell membrane in the same sense as bacteria or eukaryotic cells. They are acellular particles.
Step 3: Consider biosynthesis. A living cell can produce its own proteins and replicate its DNA or RNA using internal enzymes. Viruses rely entirely on host cell ribosomes, enzymes and energy systems.
Step 4: Recognise that each of the first three options describes one aspect of this nonliving character.
Step 5: Conclude that the most complete and accurate answer is the option that states that all of these reasons together explain why viruses are considered nonliving.
Verification / Alternative check:
Most biology textbooks state that viruses are obligate intracellular parasites that are metabolically inert outside host cells. They emphasise that viruses are acellular and cannot carry out protein synthesis or nucleic acid replication independently. These textbooks often provide a list of differences between viruses and living cells and then remark that viruses are on the borderline of life. The list in the question matches that textbook description, so the option that combines all three properties is the most accurate.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Option A is correct but incomplete because it mentions lack of metabolism but ignores structure and biosynthesis.
Option B correctly states that viruses do not have true cells, but on its own this does not fully justify calling them nonliving.
Option C highlights the dependence of viruses on host cells for protein and nucleic acid synthesis, but again this is only one part of the overall picture.
Option E is incorrect because size alone is not a criterion for being nonliving. Many bacteria and protozoa are also microscopic but are fully living organisms.
Common Pitfalls:
A common misconception is that viruses are simply very small cells. Another mistake is to assume that anything microscopic must be nonliving. To avoid these errors, focus on functional criteria such as metabolism, cellular organisation and independent reproduction. Viruses fail these tests outside a host cell, which is why many scientists treat them as nonliving particles that show life like behaviour only inside host cells.
Final Answer:
Viruses are considered nonliving because they lack metabolism, do not have true cells and cannot synthesise proteins or nucleic acids without a host, so the correct choice is All of the above statements describe why viruses are considered nonliving.
Discussion & Comments