Using genomics without complete genomes Which statement about plant genomics is most accurate for today’s research practice?

Introduction / Context:
Genomics encompasses whole-genome sequencing, transcriptomics, resequencing, pangenomes, and functional annotation. In practice, many discoveries proceed using partial or reference-guided information without requiring a perfect, finished genome assembly.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Partial assemblies, expressed sequence tags, RNA-seq, and synteny with related species provide actionable insights.
• Breeding and gene editing can target candidate genes discovered from partial datasets.
• Plant genomics has advanced rapidly, and multiple staple crops already have reference genomes and pangenomes.

Concept / Approach:
Choose the statement that best reflects modern practice: researchers can use incomplete genomic resources to design markers, map QTLs, assemble candidate pathways, and guide transformation/editing, long before a finished assembly is available.

Step-by-Step Solution:

Verification / Alternative check:
Common workflows (GWAS with reference genomes, de novo transcriptome assembly, candidate-gene cloning) proceed without perfect assemblies.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:

• Lagging behind (a): plant genomics is vibrant and extensive.
• Potato focus only (c): genomics covers cereals, legumes, fruits, trees, etc.
• All of the above (d): fails because a and c are incorrect.

Common Pitfalls:
Equating “complete finished genomes” with the minimum requirement for useful genomic research.

Final Answer:
Researchers can leverage genomic data even when an organism’s entire genome is not yet fully known