Special shell parameters — process ID of the current shell In POSIX/Bourne-compatible shells, which special parameter expands to the process number (PID) of the current shell instance?

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer:

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
Shell scripting often needs the process ID (PID) to create unique filenames, manage lock files, or send signals. POSIX shells provide built-in special parameters that expand to useful values without invoking external commands.



Given Data / Assumptions:

  • Shell is POSIX/Bourne-compatible (sh, bash, ksh, dash).
  • We need the PID of the current shell process.
  • We are not asking for PIDs of background jobs or parent processes.


Concept / Approach:

The special parameter expands to the PID of the current shell. Other related parameters include $! (PID of the most recently executed background pipeline), $0 (name of the shell or script), and $* (all positional parameters).



Step-by-Step Solution:

Echo the parameter: echo to see the PID.Use it in filenames: tmpfile=/tmp/app. toavoidcollisions.Optionallyconfirmwithps−p toavoidcollisions.Optionallyconfirmwithps−p to see the matching process.Remember $! is different (last background job PID).


Verification / Alternative check:

In an interactive shell, compare echo withthePIDreportedbypsforyourshellprocess.Insideasubshell,observethat withthePIDreportedbypsforyourshellprocess.Insideasubshell,observethat can change because it refers to that subshell's PID.



Why Other Options Are Wrong:

  • $!: PID of the most recent background job, not the current shell.
  • $0: script or shell name, not a PID.
  • $*: all positional parameters as a single word.
  • None of the above: incorrect because iscorrect.


CommonPitfalls:

Using iscorrect.


CommonPitfalls:

Using inside subshells without realizing it changes; confusing $! and ;forgettingtoquotewhenembeddinginpathswithothervariables.


FinalAnswer:

;forgettingtoquotewhenembeddinginpathswithothervariables.


FinalAnswer:

More Questions from Unix

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion