Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: A mutual exclusion synchronization primitive that allows only one thread or process at a time to enter a critical section and access a shared resource
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
When multiple threads or processes run concurrently and access shared data structures, there is a risk of race conditions and inconsistent results. Operating systems and concurrent programming libraries provide synchronization primitives to control this access. One of the most fundamental primitives is the mutex, short for mutual exclusion. Understanding what a mutex is and why it is used is essential for safe concurrent programming.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
A mutex is a lock that enforces mutual exclusion. Only one thread or process can hold the mutex at a time. When a thread wants to enter a critical section that manipulates shared state, it first attempts to lock the mutex. If the mutex is free, the thread acquires it and proceeds. If another thread already holds the mutex, the requesting thread blocks or spins until the mutex becomes available. When the owner finishes its critical section, it unlocks the mutex, allowing another waiting thread to acquire it. This mechanism prevents overlapping execution of critical sections that would otherwise lead to race conditions or corrupted data.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Step 1: Identify that the question is about synchronization in concurrent programming, not about hardware devices or memory allocation.Step 2: Recall that mutex stands for mutual exclusion, which directly suggests controlling access to shared resources.Step 3: Understand that the main purpose of a mutex is to allow exactly one thread at a time to execute a protected critical section.Step 4: Compare the options and select the one that states this purpose clearly.Step 5: Option A correctly defines a mutex as a mutual exclusion primitive for protecting critical sections.
Verification / Alternative check:
Programming interfaces such as pthreads in C or synchronized constructs in Java provide mutex like mechanisms. Documentation describes mutexes as locks that must be acquired before accessing shared data. Examples in tutorials demonstrate that failing to use mutexes around critical sections can cause inconsistent results when multiple threads increment a shared counter. Adding a mutex lock and unlock around the increment operation fixes the race condition, confirming the described purpose.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Option B describes a disk scheduling algorithm, which is unrelated to mutual exclusion.Option C refers to a memory allocation strategy and does not match the meaning of mutex.Option D talks about a hardware device that alters CPU speed, which is not what a mutex does.
Common Pitfalls:
Some learners confuse mutexes with semaphores. While both provide synchronization, a binary semaphore can be used similarly to a mutex, but mutexes typically have ownership semantics and are used specifically for mutual exclusion. Another pitfall is to forget to unlock a mutex in error paths, which can lead to deadlocks. Proper use of structured constructs or try or finally blocks is important to avoid this.
Final Answer:
The correct answer is A mutual exclusion synchronization primitive that allows only one thread or process at a time to enter a critical section and access a shared resource.
Discussion & Comments