Historically in Red Hat Linux, which hardware architecture from the list below was not supported as a primary target platform?

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: Macintosh

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
Linux distributions have varied widely in the hardware architectures they support. Red Hat historically focused on specific platforms that matched its commercial goals. Knowing which platforms were primary targets helps interpret legacy installation guides and certification items that refer to architecture support.


Given Data / Assumptions:

  • The context is legacy Red Hat Linux (pre–RHEL era), not modern Fedora or community remixes.
  • Options list several well-known CPU/platform architectures.
  • We want the item not supported as a primary Red Hat platform historically.


Concept / Approach:
Red Hat's primary and longest-supported platform was the IBM-compatible x86 PC family. There were periods of official ports for architectures such as Alpha and SPARC in some releases. In contrast, classic Apple Macintosh (particularly pre-Intel PowerPC Macintosh) was not a primary supported target for Red Hat Linux; other distributions (like Yellow Dog Linux) focused on PowerPC Macintosh systems. Therefore, among these choices, 'Macintosh' best represents the architecture not supported as a main Red Hat platform.


Step-by-Step Solution:

Identify IBM-compatible (x86) as Red Hat's core platform.Note historical ports for Alpha/SPARC that existed in some releases.Observe that PowerPC Macintosh support was not a principal Red Hat focus.Select 'Macintosh' as the unsupported primary target among the options.


Verification / Alternative check:
Review old Red Hat release notes and installation manuals. You will commonly find x86 as primary, with occasional mentions of Alpha/SPARC editions in certain versions, and little to no official Red Hat Macintosh support compared to PowerPC-focused distributions.


Why Other Options Are Wrong:

  • IBM-compatible: The canonical Red Hat platform.
  • Alpha: Had official ports in some eras.
  • SPARC: Also saw Red Hat ports historically.
  • None of the above: Incorrect because 'Macintosh' is the outlier here.


Common Pitfalls:
Conflating modern Fedora/derivatives (which may have broader community ports) with historical Red Hat Linux, or assuming that PowerPC Macintosh was a first-class Red Hat target.


Final Answer:
Macintosh

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion