Difficulty: Medium
Correct Answer: 400
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
This question deals with successive percentage allocations and then an equal division of the remaining amount. It combines percentage reduction and sharing problems, which are very common in aptitude sections that involve distribution of money among family members or partners. The key is to carefully track the remaining wealth after each stage.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
We first determine what fraction of the original wealth remains after the donation to charity. Then we find how much of that remaining amount goes to the wife and son, and thus what fraction is left for the daughters. Once we have the fraction for the daughters, dividing it equally among three girls gives the share per daughter as a fraction of W. Since each daughter gets 42 lakh, we equate that fraction to 42 and solve for W. Percentages are converted into fractions to simplify the calculations.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Step 1: Let total wealth be W.
Step 2: Donation to charity = 30% of W = 0.30W.
Step 3: Wealth left after charity = W - 0.30W = 0.70W.
Step 4: From this 0.70W, wife gets 30%: 0.30 * 0.70W = 0.21W.
Step 5: From the same 0.70W, son gets 25%: 0.25 * 0.70W = 0.175W.
Step 6: Total given to wife and son = 0.21W + 0.175W = 0.385W.
Step 7: Wealth left for three daughters = 0.70W - 0.385W = 0.315W.
Step 8: This 0.315W is divided equally among three daughters, so each daughter gets 0.315W / 3 = 0.105W.
Step 9: Given that each daughter gets 42 lakh, so 0.105W = 42.
Step 10: Therefore W = 42 / 0.105 = 400.
Step 11: So the man's total wealth is 400 lakh rupees.
Verification / Alternative check:
Check using W = 400. Charity = 30% of 400 = 120, so remaining = 280. Wife gets 30% of 280 = 84. Son gets 25% of 280 = 70. Remaining for daughters = 280 - 84 - 70 = 126. Divided among three daughters, each gets 126 / 3 = 42. This matches the given share, so W = 400 is correct.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Common Pitfalls:
Students sometimes incorrectly apply the percentages for the wife and son directly on the total W instead of on the remaining 0.70W, which changes all subsequent calculations. Another frequent error is to add the percentage amounts instead of properly subtracting them from the remaining wealth. Keeping track of each stage clearly and always noting the current base amount is essential for accuracy.
Final Answer:
The man's total wealth was 400 lakh rupees.
Discussion & Comments