In the context of Microsoft Visual Studio languages, which earlier language from the Visual Studio family was effectively replaced and discontinued when Visual Basic .NET (VB.NET) was introduced?

Difficulty: Medium

Correct Answer: Classic Visual Basic (VB 6) language used in earlier Visual Studio versions

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
When Microsoft introduced the .NET Framework and Visual Studio .NET, significant changes were made to the supported programming languages. Visual Basic .NET, often written as VB.NET, was not a simple minor update of classic Visual Basic but a redesigned language built on the common language runtime. This transition had a major impact on developers who had been using Visual Basic 6 in earlier Visual Studio releases. The question asks which earlier language from the Visual Studio family was effectively replaced or discontinued when VB.NET arrived.


Given Data / Assumptions:

  • Visual Studio historically supported multiple languages such as Visual Basic, Visual C++, and others.
  • Classic Visual Basic 6 had its own runtime and project system.
  • Visual Basic .NET was introduced as a new language tightly integrated with the .NET Framework.
  • The goal is to identify which language was effectively phased out from the mainstream Visual Studio line.


Concept / Approach:
Classic Visual Basic, especially version 6, was extremely popular for rapid application development of Windows desktop software. However, it was based on a different runtime and component model than .NET. When Visual Studio .NET launched, Microsoft introduced VB.NET as the next generation language and did not include full design time support for new classic Visual Basic projects in the same environment. While existing VB 6 applications could still run and Visual Basic 6.0 could be used as a separate product for some time, the Visual Studio family moved forward with VB.NET instead of classic VB.


Step-by-Step Solution:
Step 1: List the main Visual Studio languages during the transition period, including Visual Basic 6, Visual C++, and the newly introduced C#.Step 2: Note that Visual C++ remained part of Visual Studio because it continued to serve native code and performance sensitive applications.Step 3: Recognise that C# was a new language, not one removed, and it quickly became a primary .NET language.Step 4: Understand that Visual FoxPro followed a separate product path and was not the core Visual Studio language affected by the introduction of VB.NET.Step 5: Conclude that the language most directly replaced was classic Visual Basic 6, which gave way to Visual Basic .NET within the Visual Studio .NET family.


Verification / Alternative check:
Documentation and migration guides from the early .NET years emphasised upgrading Visual Basic 6 projects to VB.NET and explained breaking changes between the two languages. There were also compatibility tools, but Microsoft made it clear that future development should focus on VB.NET or C#. Visual C++ projects continued to be supported, and C# was entirely new, which confirms that classic Visual Basic was the language effectively retired from the mainstream Visual Studio line when VB.NET arrived.


Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Option B, Visual C++, was not removed; it continued to be supported and evolved with managed and native extensions. Option C, Visual C#, did not exist before .NET and therefore could not have been removed; it was introduced as a first class language. Option D, Visual FoxPro, had its own development environment and was not the core Visual Studio language affected by the transition to VB.NET. These alternatives do not capture the specific impact of VB.NET on classic Visual Basic 6 in the Visual Studio family.


Common Pitfalls:
A common misconception is to treat VB.NET as just another minor version of Visual Basic 6. In reality, it was a new language with different semantics, object orientation, and runtime behaviour, which made migration non trivial. Another pitfall is forgetting that Visual Basic 6 did not vanish overnight; many organisations maintained legacy projects for years. For exam and interview purposes, however, it is correct to say that classic Visual Basic was effectively replaced in the Visual Studio family by Visual Basic .NET.


Final Answer:
Correct answer: Classic Visual Basic (VB 6) language used in earlier Visual Studio versions

More Questions from Technology

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion