Statements: I. All poets are day dreamers. II. All painters are day dreamers. Conclusions: I. All painters are poets. II. Some day dreamers are not painters

Both I and II follow
Neither I nor II follows
Only I follows
Only II follows

Correct Answer: Neither I nor II follows

Explanation:

Both the Premises are Universal Affirmative (A–type).
But, these two Premises are not aligned properly.
All poets are day dreamers. ↔ Some day dreamers are painters.
A + I ⇒ No Conclusion

← Previous Question Next Question→

More Questions from Syllogism

Statements a. All children are students. b. All students are players. Conclusions /I. All cricketers are students. II. All children are players.
Statements: All men are aggressive. All children are aggressive. Conclusions: I. Men are children. II. Children are men.
Statements: 1. All goats are cows. 2. All cows are animals. Conclusions: I. All goats are animals. II. All animals are goats.
Statements: Some cars are buses. All cars are caves. Conclusions: I. Some caves are not buses. II. Some caves are buses. III. No cave is a bus. IV. Some caves are cars.
Statements: 1. Some girls are stars. 2. Meena is a girl. Conclusions: I. Meena is a star. II. Some stars are not girls.
Statements: 1. Some teachers are followers. 2. Some followers are famous. Conclusions: I. Some teachers are famous. II. Some followers are teachers.
Statements: Many books are rocks. All rocks are clips. Conclusions: I. Some books are clips. II. No rock is a book.
Statements: No man is a donkey. Ajay is a man. Conclusions: I. Ajay is not a donkey. II. All men are not Ajay.
Statements: Some kings are queens. All queens are beautiful. Conclusions: I. All kings are beautiful. II. All queens are kings.
Statements: 1. All goats are tigers. 2. All tigers are lions. Conclusions: I. All tigers are goats. II. All lions are tigers. III. No goat is a lion. IV. No lion is a goat.

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

Join Discussion