Statement: Should a poverty-ridden country invest money in hosting international games? Arguments: I. Yes, international games bring many countries on a single platform and evolve co-ordination among these countries. II. No. To host international games, a huge amount of money will be needed which will adversely affect welfare programmes aimed at eradicating poverty.

if only argument I is strong.
if only argument II is strong.
If either I or II is strong.
if neither I nor II is strong; and

Correct Answer: if only argument II is strong.

Explanation:

I is weak because though it supports a noble cause, this has nothing to do with poverty. II is strong because affordability cannot be overlooked.

← Previous Question Next Question→

More Questions from Statement and Argument

Statement: Three million tonnes of foodgrains vanished from the Food Corporation of India granaries. Should the officials of the FCL explain it to the people? Arguments: I. No. Such losses are a routine matter and therefore do not beg an explanation. II. Yes. Bungling on such a large scale by publicofficials cannot be condoned; after all it is the people's loss.
Statement: Have the economic reforms proved effective? Arguments: I. Yes. There has been a tremendous improvement in the gross domestic product (GDP) growth rate. II. No. The progress that has been made is due to the bounty of the monsoons.
Statement: Should firms give priority to getting new clients? Arguments: I. Yes. They offer the potential for additional future revenues. II. No. This would hamper the service being provided to old clients.
Statement: Should India be ruled by a coalition of regional parties? Arguments: I. Yes. This would give the states more say in the government and hence put an end to secessionist tendencies. II. No. A coalition government will he unstable and ever in crisis.
Statement: Should tobacco production be banned in the country? Arguments: I. Yes. Its consumption in any from is injurious to health. II. No. It brings money to the farmers.
Statement: Should India immediately stop digging coal from its mines? Arguments: I. Yes, The present stock of coal will not last long if we continue mining at the present rate. II. No. We do not have alternate energy source of sufficient quantity. III. No. This will put millions of people at a disadvantage and their lives will get adversely affected and also the industry.
Statement: Should there be complete ban on Indian professionals seeking Jobs elsewhere after getting their education in India? Arguments: I. Yes. This is the only way to sustain present rate of technological development in India. II. No. The Indians settled abroad send huge amount of foreign exchange and this constitutes a significant part of foreign exchange reserve III. No. The practical knowledge gained by Indians by working in other countries help India develop its economy.
Statement: Should admission to all professional courses be made on the basis of past academic performance rather than through entrance tests? Arguments: I. Yes. It will be beneficial for those candidates those who reunable to bear the expenses of entrance tests. II Yes. Many deserving candidates securing high marks in their qualifying academic examinations do not perform well on such entrance tests. III. No. The standard of examinations and assessment conducted by different Boards and universities are not comparable and hence there is a need to conduct entrance tests to calibrate them on a common yardstick.
Statement: Should all the students graduating in any discipline desirous of pursuing post-graduation of the subjects of their choice be allowed to enrol in the post-graduate courses? Arguments: I. Yes. The students are the bet judge of their capabilities and there should not be restrictions for joining post-graduate courses. II. No. The students need to study relevant subjects in graduate courses to enrol in postgraduate course and the students must fulfill such conditions. III. No. There are not enough institutes offering post-graduate courses which can accommodate all the graduates desirous of seeking post-graduate education of their own choice.
Statement: Should religion be taught in our schools? Argument: I. No. Ours is a secular state II. Yes. Teaching religion helps include moral values among children III. No. How can one dream of such a step when we want the young generation to fulfill its role in the 21st century

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

Join Discussion