Statement: Should a legislation be enacted to ensure that people elected from a party will have to stay in that outfit? Arguments: I.Yes, there is no solution to defection otherwise. II. No, it will invite frequent election in case no party succeeds to get a majority.

if only argument I is strong
if only argument II is strong
if either I or II is strong
if neither I nor II is strong

Correct Answer: if neither I nor II is strong

Explanation:

4; I is weak because it lacks substance.defection is already being talked about in the statement.II is not relevant argument.

← Previous Question Next Question→

More Questions from Statement and Argument

Statement: Should chief ministers have a say in judicial appointments? Arguments: I. Yes, exclusion of the executive completely by vesting the power in the Chief justice of India with or without a collegium of judges will not be in the interest of the public and preservation of the independence of the judiciary. II. Yes, if Central Government is give primacy in the case of the Chief Justice of India, why will the State Government be devoid of the same power regarding appointment of Chief justice of High Court?
Statement: Should there be a legislation to restrict the number of ministers? Arguments: I. Yes, in some states defections were resorted to in order to gain a majority because of which the number of Ministers have exceeded the number of MLAs.
Statement: Should there be a ban on facilitating free train service to the persons taking part in rallies organised by reputed parties? Argument: I. Yes, rallies create many problems like road jams, disruption in day -to-day activities etc and create inconvenience for the common man. II. No, otherwise people will hesitate to participate in any rallies.
Statement: Should the Cabinet approve changes in the allocation criteria for funds to the states for carrying out the accelerated rural water supply programmer? Arguments: I. Yes, We are in a would where most of the things are changing at a fast pace; uses of water have increased; therefore per capital consumption of water has also increased. II. No. Change in allocation criteria will put a burden on the budget.
Statement: Should the government withdraw its order making police intimation mandatory for citizens hosting foreign visitors? Arguments: I. No, foreign visitors have been involved in several bomb blasts and hijacking aeroplanes and many other cases of attempts to harm integrity of the nation. II. Yes, this order will give free hand to police to harass citizens.
Should the parents in India in future be forced to opt for only one child as against two or many at present? Arguments: I. Yes, this is the only way to check the ever - increasing population of India. II. No, this type of pressure tactic is not adopted by any other country in the world.
Should the sex determination test during pregnancy be completely banned? Arguments: I. yes this leads to indiscriminate female fanticide and eventually will lead to social imbalance. II. No, people have a right to know about their unborn child.
Should there be a complete ban on mining coal in India? Arguments: I. Yes, the present stock of coal will not last long if we continue mining at the present rate. II. No, we do not have alternate energy source of sufficient quantity.
Should there be uniforms for students in the colleges in India as in the schools? Arguments: I Yes, this will improve the ambiance of the colleges as all the students will be decently dressed. II. No, college students should not be regimented and they should be left to choose their clothes for coming to college.
Statement: Should the number of holidays given to Govt employees be reduced to only five in a year? Arguments: I. Yes, such holidays subsequently reduce working hours, thus adversely affecting the economy of the nation. II. No, employees require intermittent rest from hectic work schedule.

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

Join Discussion