Statement: Should Antipiracy Bill be brought in the parliament? Arguments: I. Yes, the help the film industry to fight against piracy as result of which the industry will be financially strong. II. No, we have already provisions such as copyright laws etc to fight against piracy.

if only argument I is strong
if only argument II is strong
if either I or II is strong
if neither I nor II is strong

Correct Answer: if only argument I is strong

Explanation:

Only I is strong. II is not strong because we do not know whether the existing provisions are sufficient or not .

← Previous Question Next Question→

More Questions from Statement and Argument

Statement: Should Non-Resident Indians (NRIs) be entitled to dual citizenship? Arguments: I. Yes. This will bolster the intimacy of the NRIs with the Indian soil . II. No. The move will not be fruitful for all NRIs because there is lack of provision for dual citizenship in many countries.
Statement; Should reputed private driver training schools be allowed to issue driving licences? Arguments; I. Yes, This will enable more and more people to get driving licences . II. No, This will increase the congestion of the vehicles on the road and will result in traffic jams too.
Statement: Should a trouble-torn state like Jammu & Kashmir release separatist leaders without any condition? Arguments: I. Yes, Release of separatist leaders will be useful as a goodwill gesture to make the situation peaceful in the state. II. No, Unconditional release of the separatist leaders will aggravate the existing situation because these leaders have not shown any flexibility in their views.
Statement: Should medical colleges be allowed to admit students even after the commencement of their session, if the seats remain unfilled? Arguments: I. Yes, unfilled seats will weaken the economic condition of the colleges. II. No, this will hamper the study of the students of the entire batch .
Statement: Should robots replace astronauts in space missions? Arguments: I. Yes, this will save the precious life of human beings. II. No, this will make space mission more expensive.
Statement: Should cricket teams of smaller countries who have no long history in cricket be allowed to play in Word cup cricket matches? Arguments : I. Yes, this will help the globalisation of cricket -gentleman 's game . II. No, this will upset the records established in thought, more challenging situations.
Statement: Should subsidy be given on blended fuel in India? Arguments: I. Yes, this will encourage the use of blended fuel ( an environment-friendly fuel ) as a result of which the burden of import of fuel will reduce and ultimately save the country 's foreign exchange reserves. II. No, blended fuel is not available in all states of India.
Statement: Should user charge be increased in sectors like telecom? Arguments: I. Yes, revenue earned through hike in user charges will be helpful in improving the quality of services provided by these sector to the consumer. II. No, hike in user charges will deprive many consumers of the services provided by these sectors.
Statement: Should government keep other oil PSUs out of the HPCL disinvestment. Arguments: I. yes, this will keep precious funds of other oil PSUs out of unproductive expenditure. II. No, these oil units will take keen interest and bid higher then the private units.
Statement: Should cricket players be punished with life ban for having nexus with bookies. Arguments: I. No, any such ban will discourage other players too. II. Yes, events of matchfixing have unnerved the common man .A stringent law like life ban will not only make cricket more dynamic but also restore its old glory as a game of honest persons.

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

Join Discussion