Home » Verbal Reasoning » Statement and Argument

Statement: Should all the practicing doctors be brought under Government control so that they get salary from the Government and treat patients free of cost? Arguments: I. No. How can any country do such an undemocratic thing? II. Yes. Despite many problems, it will certainly help minimize, if not eradicate , unethical medical practices.

if only argument I is strong
if only argument II is strong
if either I or II is strong
if neither I nor II is strong and

Correct Answer: if only argument II is strong

Explanation:

A doctor treating a patient individually can mislead the patient into wrong and unnecessary treatment for his personal gain. so, argument II holds strong. Also, a policy beneficial to common people cannot be termed 'undemocratic'. So, I is vague.

← Previous Question Next Question→

More Questions from Statement and Argument

Statement: Should there be more than one High Courts in each state in India? Arguments: I. No. This will be a sheer wastage of taxpayers' money. II. Yes. This will help reduce the backlog of cases pending for a very long time.
Statment Are nuclear families better than joint families? Argument I. No joint familes enssure security aand aalsso reduce the burden of work. II. Yes Nuclear families ensure greater freedom.
Statement : Should there be concentration of foreign investment in only few states? Argument : I. No. It is against the policy of overall development of the country. II. Yes. A large number of states lack infrastructure to attract foreign investment.
Statement : Should India engage into a dialogue with neighboring countries to stop cross border tension? Argument: I. Yes. This is the only way to reduce the cross border terrorism and stop loss of innocent lives. II. No. Neighboring countries cannot be relied upon in such matters, they may still engage in subversive activities.
Statement: Should system of offering jobs only to the wards of government employees be introduced in all government offices in India? Argument: I. No. It denies opportunity to many deserving individuals and government may stand to lose in the long run. II. No. It is against the principle of equality. Does not government owe its responsibility to all its citizens?
Statement: Should the sex determination test during pregnancy be completely banned? Arguments: I. Yes. This leads to indiscriminate female feticide and eventually will lead to social imbalance. II. No. People have a right to know about their unborn child.
Statement: Should there be only one rate of interest nor term deposits of varying durations in banks? Arguments: I. No, People will refrain from keeping money for longer duration resulting into reduction of liquidity level of banks. II Yes. This will be much simple for the common people and they may be encouraged to keep more money in banks.
Statement: Should all refugees, who make unauthorized entry into a country, be forced to go back to their homeland? Arguments: I. Yes, they leave their colonies and occupy a lot of land. II. No. they leave their homes because of hanger or some terror and on human grounds, should not be forced to go back.
Statement: Should the oil companies be allowed to fix the price of petroleum products depending on market conditions? Arguments: I. Yes. This is the only way to make the oil companies commercially viable. II. No. This will put additional burden on the retail prices of essential commodities and will cause a lot of hardships to the masses.
Statement: Should there be a maximum limit for the number of ministers in the Central government? Arguments: I. No. The political party in power should have the freedom to decide the number of ministers to be appointed. II. Yes. The number of ministers should be restricted to a certain percentage of the total number of seats in the parliament to avoid unnecessary expenditure.

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

Join Discussion