The statement Type 1 diabetes is more common than type 2 diabetes is being evaluated. How should this statement be judged based on the actual relative frequency of these two forms of diabetes in the population?

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: This statement is incorrect because type 2 diabetes is more common than type 1 diabetes.

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
Diabetes mellitus is broadly divided into type 1 and type 2 forms. Understanding the basic differences between these two types, including how common each is, is important for general health awareness and basic biology exams. The question presents a statement about the relative frequency of the two types and asks you to judge whether that statement is correct or incorrect based on real world epidemiology.


Given Data / Assumptions:

  • The statement claims that type 1 diabetes is more common than type 2 diabetes.
  • We are asked to evaluate the correctness of this claim.
  • Options offer judgements such as correct, incorrect, equal frequency, no adult cases, or lack of data.
  • We assume typical global patterns where type 2 diabetes is more prevalent.


Concept / Approach:
Type 1 diabetes is usually an autoimmune condition that destroys insulin producing beta cells in the pancreas. It often begins in childhood or adolescence and requires lifelong insulin therapy. Type 2 diabetes is associated with insulin resistance and relative insulin deficiency, commonly linked to overweight, sedentary lifestyle, and genetic factors. It typically occurs in adults but is increasingly seen in younger people. Epidemiological data show that type 2 diabetes accounts for the vast majority of diabetes cases worldwide, while type 1 represents a relatively small fraction. Therefore, any statement claiming that type 1 is more common than type 2 is incorrect.


Step-by-Step Solution:
Step 1: Recall that type 2 diabetes is often described as the common form of diabetes in adults. Step 2: Note that type 1 diabetes is less common and typically associated with autoimmune destruction of beta cells. Step 3: Consider that in most countries, type 2 cases greatly outnumber type 1 cases. Step 4: Compare this knowledge with the statement that type 1 diabetes is more common than type 2 diabetes. Step 5: Recognise that the statement contradicts the known epidemiology. Step 6: Conclude that the statement must be judged as incorrect, and select the option that explicitly states this.


Verification / Alternative check:
Public health sources and diabetes associations consistently report that type 2 diabetes accounts for about 85 to 90 percent or more of all diabetes cases. Type 1 diabetes makes up a much smaller percentage. Educational materials often call type 2 diabetes adult onset or non insulin dependent diabetes in older terminology, emphasising its widespread prevalence. This data confirms that the statement in the question is incorrect.


Why Other Options Are Wrong:
This statement is correct because type 1 diabetes is indeed more common worldwide: Directly contradicts established epidemiological data. Both types occur with exactly the same frequency in all populations: Oversimplifies and ignores real differences in prevalence and variation between populations. Neither type 1 nor type 2 diabetes occurs in adults at all: Incorrect, because both forms can occur in adults, especially type 2. The statement cannot be evaluated because there are no data on diabetes frequency: Incorrect, as extensive data and studies exist on diabetes prevalence.


Common Pitfalls:
Some learners may think of type 1 diabetes as more serious and therefore assume it is more common, when in fact type 2 is more prevalent but often develops slowly. Another confusion arises from older terms like juvenile and adult onset diabetes, which can blur the understanding that both types can appear at various ages. To avoid error, remember that type 2 diabetes is the dominant form in terms of numbers of cases worldwide.


Final Answer:
The statement is incorrect because type 2 diabetes is more common than type 1 diabetes.

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion