Difficulty: Medium
Correct Answer: 6 m
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
This question uses the idea of complementary angles of elevation from two points at different distances from a tower. Complementary angles (adding to 90°) produce a relationship between tangent and cotangent, which we can exploit to find the tower's height without explicitly knowing the individual angles.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
If one angle of elevation is θ, the other is 90° − θ. For a height h and horizontal distance d, we have:
tan(θ) = h / d1tan(90° − θ) = cot(θ) = h / d2Because tan(θ) * cot(θ) = 1, we can form an equation involving d1, d2 and h and solve for h.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Let h be the tower height.From the nearer point (distance 4 m): tan(θ) = h / 4.From the farther point (distance 9 m): tan(90° − θ) = cot(θ) = h / 9.We know tan(θ) * cot(θ) = 1.Thus: (h / 4) * (h / 9) = 1.h^2 / 36 = 1 ⇒ h^2 = 36.h = 6 m (positive height only).
Verification / Alternative check:
If h = 6 m, then from d1 = 4 m, tan(θ) = 6 / 4 = 1.5. From d2 = 9 m, tan(90° − θ) = h / 9 = 6 / 9 = 2 / 3. Since 1.5 and 2 / 3 are reciprocals, they are indeed tan(θ) and tan(90° − θ) respectively, confirming complementarity.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
4 m, 5 m, 7 m, 9 m: None of these values satisfy the product condition (h / 4) * (h / 9) = 1 when squared. They either make the product less than or greater than 1, violating the complementary angle property.
Common Pitfalls:
Students may assume specific angles like 30° and 60° without checking if they satisfy the distance ratios. Another error is adding or subtracting distances and heights instead of using the tangent relationships. Forgetting that tan and cot are reciprocals for complementary angles can also lead to incorrect setups.
Final Answer:
The height of the tower is 6 m.
Discussion & Comments