Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: True
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:In circuit theory, 3×3 determinants appear when solving three simultaneous equations (e.g., three-node nodal analysis with Cramer’s rule). Knowing standard evaluation methods speeds up hand calculations and checks.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
“Expansion method” typically refers to expanding along a row or column using minors; the “cofactor method” is the same approach stated formally with signs (cofactors). Thus the statement is correct. One may also use Sarrus’ rule for 3×3, or convert to triangular form via elimination and multiply diagonal elements, but the assertion remains accurate as written.
Step-by-Step Solution:
1) Choose a row/column with zeros if possible to reduce arithmetic.2) Compute minors by deleting the chosen row and column.3) Apply alternating signs to form cofactors.4) Sum the products of entries and their cofactors to obtain the determinant.Verification / Alternative check:
Cross-verify with Sarrus’ shortcut for 3×3 matrices to ensure numerical consistency in practice.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
“False” contradicts standard linear algebra. Claiming “only Gaussian elimination is valid” ignores many correct analytical methods.
Common Pitfalls:
Forgetting the checkerboard sign pattern of cofactors; arithmetic slips when computing minors; misapplying Sarrus to non-3×3 cases.
Final Answer:
True.
Discussion & Comments