Should students take an active part in politics while they are studying? Arguments: 1. Yes, because participation in politics helps to inculcate the quality of leadership among students. 2. No, because students should focus on their studies and build their careers during the college years.

Difficulty: Medium

Correct Answer: Both arguments 1 and 2 are strong

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
This question deals with students involvement in politics. One argument supports participation due to leadership development, while the other warns that politics may distract from studies and career building. Both sides may present strong reasoning.


Given Data / Assumptions:

  • Statement: Students should take part in politics.
  • Argument 1: Yes, it develops leadership qualities.
  • Argument 2: No, students should concentrate on studies and careers.
  • We assume that both leadership skills and academic performance are important for young people.


Concept / Approach:
For such social issues, exam questions often have two strong yet opposing arguments. Political participation can indeed train students in leadership, organisation and public speaking. At the same time, excessive involvement can harm studies if not balanced carefully. Both are realistic concerns.


Step-by-Step Solution:
Step 1: Evaluate argument 1. Active politics provides practical experience in leadership, decision making and teamwork. Step 2: These skills are valuable, so argument 1 is strong. Step 3: Evaluate argument 2. Student life is also meant for academic learning and professional preparation. Heavy political involvement may reduce time for study. Step 4: This is also a valid concern and therefore argument 2 is strong as well.


Verification / Alternative check:
Consider real campuses. Balanced student leaders manage both studies and politics, but many struggle. This shows that both arguments express real aspects of the issue.


Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Options that select only one argument ignore the other side of the real life situation. The option that neither argument is strong is wrong because both describe genuine and important effects. The option that the issue cannot be judged is also incorrect; we can judge the strength of each argument.


Common Pitfalls:
Students often think they must pick a side. In statement and argument questions, however, you only need to judge whether the arguments are strong, not which policy you personally support.


Final Answer:
Therefore, both arguments 1 and 2 are strong, and the correct option is the one that selects both as strong.

More Questions from Statement and Argument

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion