Development effort assertion:\nAssess the claim:\n\n"Writing stored procedures takes less time than using Visual Basic or PowerBuilder to create an application."

Introduction / Context:
Stored procedures implement data-centric business logic inside the DBMS, while tools such as Visual Basic or PowerBuilder are used to build full applications, including presentation and orchestration. This question probes a blanket time-to-develop assertion that is misleading without context.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Stored procedures handle data manipulation, validations, and set-oriented operations.
• GUI application development involves UI design, event handling, navigation, and client-side logic.
• Project scope and complexity determine effort; the technologies address different concerns.

Concept / Approach:
You cannot generally say stored procedures take less time than creating an entire application. For a given data operation, a single stored procedure may be concise and performant, but building the whole application still requires significant client-side work. In many modern stacks, business logic is split between services and the DB; effort depends on distribution of responsibilities, tooling, and team skills.

Step-by-Step Solution:

Verification / Alternative check:
Review project schedules showing UI development, integration, and testing often dwarf individual stored-proc coding tasks.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:

• Universal or platform-specific variants do not fix the apples-to-oranges comparison.

Common Pitfalls:
Over-centralizing logic in the DB; assuming stored procs eliminate the need for robust middle tiers; ignoring maintainability and versioning.

Final Answer:
Does not apply (the claim is generally incorrect)