Syllogism — Pencils, Birds, Skies, Hills Statements: • All pencils are birds. • All birds are skies. • All skies are hills. Conclusions: I. All pencils are hills. II. All hills are birds. III. All skies are pencils. IV. All birds are hills.

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: None of these

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
This is a straightforward chain of universal inclusions. Be careful not to reverse subset directions. From A ⊆ B ⊆ C ⊆ D, you can derive A ⊆ D and B ⊆ D, but not D ⊆ B or C ⊆ A.



Given Data / Assumptions:

  • Pencils ⊆ Birds ⊆ Skies ⊆ Hills.


Concept / Approach:
Transitivity of “All”: If X ⊆ Y and Y ⊆ Z, then X ⊆ Z. Do not invert inclusions unless explicitly given.



Step-by-Step Solution:

I. All pencils are hills — follows, since Pencils ⊆ Hills via the chain.II. All hills are birds — does not follow; the chain only shows Birds ⊆ Hills, not the converse.III. All skies are pencils — does not follow; Pencils ⊆ Birds ⊆ Skies, not Skies ⊆ Pencils.IV. All birds are hills — follows, because Birds ⊆ Skies ⊆ Hills.


Verification / Alternative check:
Draw nested sets: P ⊆ B ⊆ S ⊆ H. It is visually clear that I and IV are true while II and III are false.



Why Other Options Are Wrong:

  • Options a–c do not match the true pair {I, IV}.
  • “All follow” is incorrect because II and III are false.


Common Pitfalls:
Accidentally reversing subset relations (assuming hills are birds, or skies are pencils).



Final Answer:
None of these (because the correct set is I and IV, a combination not listed).

More Questions from Logical Deduction

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion