Home » Verbal Reasoning » Statement and Argument

Statement: Should India adopt open ballot system for election in Upper House? Arguments: I. Yes, it would lessen the problem of cross-voting as well as the problem of money power. II. No, this would increase the number of cases regarding anti-defection.

if only argument I is strong
if only argument II is strong
if either I or II is strong
if neither I nor II is strong; and

Correct Answer: if only argument I is strong

Explanation:

I is strong because it is based on an established fact. II is weak because it is not true.

← Previous Question Next Question→

More Questions from Statement and Argument

Statement: Should surcharge imposed on companies in India be waived off? Arguments: I. Yes, the surcharge imposed on companies in India, is more in amount in comparison to foreign countries like USA, Japan etc. II. Yes, the amount earned though surcharge is very less.
Statement: Should religious leave given to Central employees be reduced in India? Arguments: I. Yes, religious leave has a lion's share in the total leave (more than 150 days) given to the age -old problem of huge pending work of Central employees. II. No, India is a secular country.
Statement: Should evidence of witnesses staying in foreign countries recorded by trial courts through video conferencing be legalized? Arguments: I. Yes, this will reduce the problem of witnesses regarding unnecessary traveling. II. No, a system initiated by our forefathers must not be changed at all.
Statement: Should non- operational airports in India be closed down? Arguments: I. Yes, a lot of money goes in vain in order to maintain these airports. II. No, what will those people involved in the maintenance of these airports do?
Statement: Should creation of infrastructure for sports be emphasised in India? Arguments: I. No, it will be futile to invest money because our sportsperson always dishearten our people and fail to show their miracles on the international arena on several occasions. II. Yes, despite being a country 100 crores, our performance in sports in international arena is very dismal; we are in dire need to foster new sports culture.
Statement: Should HIV+ kids be facilitated with 'in-house school ' instead of allowing to continue 'outside school'? Arguments: I. Yes, this preventive step will ease the tension of majority of parents who send their wards to 'outside schools'? II. No, 'in-house school' facility will isolate the children from the outside world; the move will harm the basic purpose of education and do the children more harm than good.
Statement: Should foreign collaborations in higher education be allowed without proper scrutiny? Arguments: I. No, no association should be allowed without proper scrutiny because sometimes these collaboration turn out to be frauds. There are cases where the association promises job securities and other facilities for students but which, in reality, are nothing but a shame. II. No, our country is already facing the problem of 'brain drain'. Many foreign universities and institutes lure talented and hardworking students to join their courses which subsequently leads to 'brain drain' as they promise jobs in foreign countries.
Statement : Should there be reservation for the very poor among the upper castes? Arguments: I. Yes, the purpose of reservation is to uplift the standard of the life of the weaker section of the people, which includes the very poor among the upper castes also. II. No, the move will divide people of upper castes and will harm age-old social structure too.
Statement: Should conditional access system (CAS) be put in place in India? Arguments: I. Yes, this will enable television viewers of India the freedom to access the channel of their choice and pay for only the ones selected. II. No, the system negates the basic requirements such as the rights and obligations of broadcasters, cable operators and consumers. Besides, instead of offering a real choice to consumers at reasonable costs, the system promotes commercial interests of broadcasters or set-top manufacturers.
Statement: Should doctors and engineers be banned from civil services examination? Arguments: I. No, banning engineers and medicos from joining civil services means denying the best talent in the land to work for the welfare of the society. II. Yes, taxpayers money is being used to finance the studies of doctors and engineers, particularly in government institutes. The money spent on them goes down the drain once a medico or engineer shifts tracks to civil services.

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

Join Discussion