Statement: "If you trouble me, I will slap you." - A mother warns her child. Assumptions: With the warning, the child may stop troubling her. All children are basically naughty.

Given data

• Statement: 'If you trouble me, I will slap you.'
• Assumption I: The warning may deter the child.
• Assumption II: All children are basically naughty.

Concept/Approach
A threat is issued with the belief it can influence behavior; sweeping generalizations about all children are unnecessary.

Step-by-step reasoning
I: If the warning could not influence the child, issuing it would be pointless. So I is implicit.II: The mother's statement concerns her child, not all children. Hence II is not required.

Verification/Alternative
Local efficacy assumption (I) suffices; no universal claim (II) is needed.

Common pitfalls

• Reading a universal premise into a particular, situational warning.

Final Answer
Only assumption I is implicit.