Statement–Argument — Should the Government ban export of all food grains for the next one year to handle a potential drought? Arguments: I. Yes. Temporarily prioritising domestic supply is necessary to ensure food security for citizens. II. No. The Government lacks jurisdiction to ban private exporters. III. Yes. The Government should restrict exports and procure stocks from exporters to stabilise domestic availability.

Introduction / Context:
In drought contingencies, governments weigh trade policy against domestic food security. Temporary export controls and strategic procurement can stabilise prices and availability.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Food security is a core state responsibility during supply shocks.
• Export policy instruments (bans, quotas, MSP-linked procurement) are within typical sovereign powers.
• Private exporter rights operate within national trade regulations.

Concept / Approach:
A strong argument aligns with feasibility and public-interest goals. Assertions about lack of jurisdiction must be accurate to be strong; practical steps to secure supply matter.

Step-by-Step Solution:
1) I affirms the protective role of a temporary export ban to prioritise domestic needs—a direct, relevant rationale. Strong.2) II claims the Government lacks jurisdiction over private exporters; this is generally incorrect—export controls are routine instruments of trade policy. Weak.3) III proposes operational follow-through: restrict exports and procure stocks to build buffers—highly relevant to food security objectives. Strong.

Verification / Alternative check:
Many countries use temporary export restrictions in shocks; governments also expand public procurement for buffer stocks—consistent with I and III.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:
“I and II” includes a faulty premise; “II and III/Only II/None” mischaracterise state capacity and ignore the valid security rationale.

Common Pitfalls:
Confusing legal capacity with policy prudence; ignoring time-bounded, targeted design to minimise market disruption.

Final Answer:
I and III are strong.