Difficulty: Medium
Correct Answer: Neither I nor II is implicit
Explanation:
Given data
Concept/Approach
An assumption must be necessary for the stated comparative claim about metro readership. Irrelevant details about other regions or specific features are not required unless the claim would otherwise fail.
Step-by-step reasoning
1) The statement is purely city-specific (Mumbai readership ranking).2) Popularity in mofussil areas (I) does not affect the metro ranking; hence I is not necessary.3) Having cartoons (II) is at best a possible reason for popularity; the ranking can hold for many other reasons (news coverage, circulation network). Thus II is not required.
Verification/Alternative
We can imagine the ranking being true whether or not mofussil popularity exists and whether or not cartoons are present. So neither assumption is indispensable.
Common pitfalls
Final Answer
Neither I nor II is implicit.
Discussion & Comments