Introduction / Context:
“Give in” is a phrasal verb that, in political and negotiation contexts, means to yield or to submit after resistance. The sentence contrasts external pressure with a firm stance by the Government, explicitly stating that it will not “give in,” i.e., will not yield to the demands.
Given Data / Assumptions:
- Phrasal verb: give in.
- Context: pressure applied by militants; governmental response.
- Polarity: negated (not to give in) → to refuse to yield.
Concept / Approach:
When assessing phrasal verbs, map them to their nearest one-word verbs in the appropriate register. “Give in” aligns with “yield.” While “accede” can sometimes mean agree, it often implies formal assent to a request or treaty; in this sentence, “yield” is the more exact opposite of “stand firm.” “Confirm” is unrelated; “oblige” means to do a favor or meet a request, which is not the core sense here.
Step-by-Step Solution:
1) Identify action frame: pressure vs resistance.2) Decode “give in” as “yield/submit.”3) Choose the nearest one-word verb: “yield.”4) Verify that the negation signals continued resistance.
Verification / Alternative check:
Paraphrase: “The Government has decided not to yield.” This reads naturally and preserves the intended stance.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
accede: Formal consent; not as direct a counterpart to resistance.oblige: Doing a favor; wrong action frame.confirm: About validation/ratification; unrelated.
Common Pitfalls:
Assuming all “agree/consent” verbs are interchangeable. “Give in” emphasizes surrendering to pressure, which “yield” captures precisely.
Final Answer:
yield
Discussion & Comments