English grammar – Spot the error (choose the part with an error or “No error”). Inversion pattern: Scarcely had / he gone / when a policeman / knocked at the door.

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: No error.

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
This sentence uses the standard correlative “Scarcely … when …” with inversion and perfect aspect to mark near-simultaneous past events. The task is to see whether any segment is ungrammatical.



Given Data / Assumptions:

  • Auxiliary “had” plus past participle “gone.”
  • Conjunction “when” introducing the second event.
  • Simple past “knocked” for the following action.


Concept / Approach:
All parts are correct: “Scarcely had he gone when …” is a recognized formal pattern (alternatively, “Hardly had … when …”). The sequence “past perfect” for the earlier event and “simple past” for the subsequent event is appropriate.



Step-by-Step Check:

A: “Scarcely had …” inversion is correct.B: Past participle “gone” after “had.”C: “when” is the right correlative with “scarcely.”D: “knocked” correctly marks the later event.


Verification / Alternative check:

Alternative wording: “Hardly had he gone when …” is equally fine.


Why Other Options Are Wrong:

None are wrong; each element fits the formal pattern.


Common Pitfalls:

Replacing “when” with “than” (that belongs to “no sooner … than …”).


Final Answer:
No error.

More Questions from Spotting Errors

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion