Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: No error.
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:This sentence uses the standard correlative “Scarcely … when …” with inversion and perfect aspect to mark near-simultaneous past events. The task is to see whether any segment is ungrammatical.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:All parts are correct: “Scarcely had he gone when …” is a recognized formal pattern (alternatively, “Hardly had … when …”). The sequence “past perfect” for the earlier event and “simple past” for the subsequent event is appropriate.
Step-by-Step Check:
A: “Scarcely had …” inversion is correct.B: Past participle “gone” after “had.”C: “when” is the right correlative with “scarcely.”D: “knocked” correctly marks the later event.Verification / Alternative check:
Alternative wording: “Hardly had he gone when …” is equally fine.Why Other Options Are Wrong:
None are wrong; each element fits the formal pattern.Common Pitfalls:
Replacing “when” with “than” (that belongs to “no sooner … than …”).Final Answer:No error.
Discussion & Comments