English grammar – Spot the error (choose the part with an error or “No error”). Sentence: We don't deny / your right to know / whatever happened while / you were not in the office.

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: No error.

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
This item tests clause structure and tense in a complex sentence involving a negated main clause and a temporal subordinate clause. The task is to determine whether any segment contains a grammatical error.



Given Data / Assumptions:

  • Main clause: “We don’t deny your right to know …”.
  • Object: a gerund-participial complement “your right to know”.
  • Embedded content clause: “whatever happened while you were not in the office.”


Concept / Approach:
All parts align with standard usage: “right to know” is idiomatic; “whatever happened” uses past tense for a completed time; “while you were not in the office” is a correct temporal clause. There is no disagreement, faulty preposition, or tense mismatch.



Step-by-Step Solution:

A: Negative declarative is properly formed.B: Infinitive phrase functions correctly as complement to “right.”C: Free relative “whatever” + past verb “happened” is grammatical.D: Past progressive context in the temporal clause is appropriate (“were not in the office”).


Verification / Alternative check:

One could also write “while you were out of the office,” which is stylistic, not grammatical.


Why Other Options Are Wrong:

They are not wrong; each stands correct, so “No error.” is the right choice.


Common Pitfalls:

Over-correcting idiomatic structures like “right to know” or the free-relative “whatever.”


Final Answer:
No error.

More Questions from Spotting Errors

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion