Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: Data inadequate
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
This is the same structural check as earlier feasibility problems. Under simple interest, the fraction I / P depends solely on r and t. If it does not equal the claimed fraction, no specific principal can satisfy the condition, and a unique sum cannot be determined.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
Compute I / P = (r * t) / 100. Compare with 1/2. If unequal, the data do not yield a unique principal compatible with the claim.
Step-by-Step Solution:
I / P = (8 * 6) / 100 = 0.48Claim requires 0.50 → inconsistent. Therefore no unique P exists under this claim.
Verification / Alternative check:
Testing any P shows the same 48% outcome, not 50%. Thus the contradiction is independent of P.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Specific rupee values cannot fix a percentage inconsistency. “Not possible” is acceptable wording; the intended key is that the data do not allow a unique principal to be found.
Common Pitfalls:
Misreading the claim as “half the amount” would lead to different equations. The problem clearly mentions the principal.
Final Answer:
Data inadequate
Discussion & Comments