Identify the seven-bit character code: The ________ code represents alphanumeric characters (letters, digits, punctuation, and controls) as standardized seven-bit binary numbers.

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: ASCII

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
Character encodings map symbols to numerical codes. Historically, the most influential 7-bit standard is ASCII, which defined codes for letters, digits, punctuation, and control characters used in communications and computing. This item checks recognition of that specific seven-bit standard among distractors.


Given Data / Assumptions:

  • Standardized code uses 7 bits (values 0–127).
  • Represents alphanumeric characters and control functions (e.g., LF, CR).
  • Used widely in early terminals, file formats, and protocols; forms a subset of modern Unicode encodings.


Concept / Approach:
Identify the name that matches a seven-bit, widely adopted character set: ASCII (American Standard Code for Information Interchange). Other names either refer to number systems (octal), are non-standard terms, or different encodings (EBCDIC is 8-bit and IBM-mainframe oriented).


Step-by-Step Solution:

Recall that ASCII is defined over 7 bits.Match ASCII’s scope: letters, digits, punctuation, control codes.Eliminate distractors that do not fit a seven-bit standardized character code.Select ASCII as correct.


Verification / Alternative check:
Consult any basic computing reference: ASCII 0x41–0x5A are uppercase A–Z, 0x61–0x7A lowercase a–z, confirming its intended breadth of characters in 7 bits.


Why Other Options Are Wrong:

  • Octal: A base-8 number system, not a character code.
  • Alphanumeric: A descriptive adjective, not a standardized code name.
  • Boy Scout: Irrelevant distractor.
  • EBCDIC: A distinct 8-bit family used on mainframes, not 7-bit ASCII.


Common Pitfalls:
Confusing ASCII with EBCDIC; assuming all legacy encodings are 8-bit; forgetting that ASCII’s canonical size is 7 bits even though commonly stored in 8-bit bytes.


Final Answer:
ASCII

More Questions from Number Systems and Codes

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion