Arrange the following in a meaningful causal-judicial sequence: (i) Police, (ii) Punishment, (iii) Crime, (iv) Judge, (v) Judgement.
-
A(i), (ii), (iv), (iii), (v)
-
B(v), (iv), (iii), (ii), (i)
-
C(iii), (i), (iv), (v), (ii)
-
D(iii), (i), (ii), (iv), (v)
-
ENone of these
Answer
Correct Answer: (iii), (i), (iv), (v), (ii)
Explanation
Introduction / Context:Event-order questions test your ability to sequence real-world processes. Here the scenario is a simplified criminal-justice pipeline from offense to punishment via institutional steps.
Given Data / Assumptions:
- Entities: Crime, Police, Judge, Judgement, Punishment.
- Assume a standard due-process path: investigation precedes adjudication; verdict precedes punishment.
Concept / Approach:Anchor the start (Crime) and end (Punishment). Position investigative (Police) and adjudicatory (Judge → Judgement) stages in between according to common legal procedure.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Crime occurs first: (iii).Police investigate/apprehend: (i).Trial before Judge: (iv).Judgement (verdict): (v).Punishment follows judgement: (ii).Final order: (iii), (i), (iv), (v), (ii).Verification / Alternative check:Compare with standard legal flow: offense → investigation → trial → verdict → sentencing. Matches exactly.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
- Sequences starting with Police or Judge ignore causality; punishment cannot precede judgement.
Common Pitfalls:Swapping judgement and punishment; placing Police after Judge.
Final Answer:(iii), (i), (iv), (v), (ii)