Arrange the following in a meaningful causal-judicial sequence: (i) Police, (ii) Punishment, (iii) Crime, (iv) Judge, (v) Judgement.

Introduction / Context:
Event-order questions test your ability to sequence real-world processes. Here the scenario is a simplified criminal-justice pipeline from offense to punishment via institutional steps.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Entities: Crime, Police, Judge, Judgement, Punishment.
• Assume a standard due-process path: investigation precedes adjudication; verdict precedes punishment.

Concept / Approach:
Anchor the start (Crime) and end (Punishment). Position investigative (Police) and adjudicatory (Judge → Judgement) stages in between according to common legal procedure.

Step-by-Step Solution:

Verification / Alternative check:
Compare with standard legal flow: offense → investigation → trial → verdict → sentencing. Matches exactly.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:

• Sequences starting with Police or Judge ignore causality; punishment cannot precede judgement.

Common Pitfalls:
Swapping judgement and punishment; placing Police after Judge.

Final Answer:
(iii), (i), (iv), (v), (ii)