Reordering of sentences (Indian museums): arrange P, Q, R and S to form a coherent paragraph between S1 and S6. S1: Museums in India tend to be dreary experiences. S6: Because it is better to attract crowds than dust.

Introduction / Context:
This jumbled passage comments on how Indian museums are often dull and need to become more engaging. Your task is to order P, Q, R and S between S1 and S6 so that the argument flows from the present dreary state to a call for change and an example of a successful modern approach.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• S1: Museums in India tend to be dreary experiences.
• S6: Because it is better to attract crowds than dust.
• P: Even the Louvre that attracted an eye popping 8.1 million visitors last year compared to India's 10.18 million foreign tourists, has hooked up with famous musicians for promotion, where they take a selfie with the Mona Lisa.
• Q: Our museums need to get cool too.
• R: A change of approach is clearly called for.
• S: Troops of restless schoolchildren are often the most frequent visitors, endlessly being told to lower their voices and not touch the art.

Concept / Approach:
The paragraph should:

• Describe the current dull experience (S1 and S).
• Conclude that a change is needed (R).
• Provide a positive example from abroad (P).
• Call for Indian museums to adopt a similar modern, engaging approach (Q), leading naturally into S6.

This structure moves from problem description to solution and example, which is typical in editorial style writing.

Step-by-Step Solution:
Step 1: S1 says museums are dreary. S continues this idea by painting a picture of schoolchildren scolded and restricted, which reinforces the dull atmosphere. So S should follow S1. Step 2: After describing the problem, R logically follows: \"A change of approach is clearly called for.\" This sentence directly arises from the negative picture in S. Step 3: Once a change is demanded, the paragraph offers an example of how another world famous museum, the Louvre, has adapted. P shows this concrete example of an innovative promotional strategy. Step 4: After the example, Q draws the conclusion for India: \"Our museums need to get cool too.\" This sets up S6, which justifies that approach by saying it is better to attract people than dust. Step 5: Therefore, the correct order of the middle sentences is S → R → P → Q, that is S R P Q.

Verification / Alternative check:
If you start with P immediately after S1, the passage jumps to the Louvre before fully describing the problem in India. If Q comes earlier, the call to \"get cool\" appears before either the negative picture or the positive example, weakening the argument. Only S R P Q maintains a persuasive progression: gloomy reality, call for change, inspiring example, and concluding recommendation.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Option \"P Q R S\": The example of the Louvre appears before the dreary experience of Indian museums is fully described, making the paragraph feel disordered. Option \"P R S Q\": Again the example comes too early, and R and S are not in a natural cause effect order. Option \"Q S R P\": The suggestion that museums \"need to get cool\" appears before the reader has seen the negative description in S and before the call for change in R.

Common Pitfalls:
Many learners focus only on numerical data like visitor counts and assume that sentence must come first. In jumbled passages, always ask: what is the writer trying to prove or criticise, and how do they build that case step by step? Here the emotional picture of bored children and dull museums must come before the example and the policy recommendation.

Final Answer:
The coherent order of the middle sentences is S R P Q, producing a smooth and persuasive paragraph about the need to modernise Indian museums.