Sentence ordering: choose the correct sequence of P, Q, R, S in the paragraph about the Nobel Peace Prize for fighting sexual violence in war.

Introduction / Context:
This jumbled paragraph question refers to a Nobel Peace Prize that honours efforts to end the use of sexual violence as a weapon of war. The first sentence S1 mentions that the United Nations recognised rape as a war crime and a constitutive act of genocide. The last sentence S6 notes that the two peace laureates come from different nations, showing how widespread the problem is. We must order the middle sentences P, Q, R, and S logically between S1 and S6.

Given Data / Assumptions:

P introduces this year s Nobel Peace Prize and states that it has been awarded to two exceptional individuals for their fight against sexual violence in war.
Q describes Denis Mukwege, a doctor who treats rape survivors in the Democratic Republic of Congo.
R introduces Nadia Murad as a survivor of sexual war crimes committed by a militant group against the Yazidis.
S states that she now campaigns to bring those leaders before international courts.

Concept / Approach:
A well constructed paragraph often follows a pattern: general context, introduction of the main topic, description of supporting examples, and then a concluding observation. Here, after S1 sets the context about rape as a war crime, the paragraph should immediately introduce the specific Nobel Peace Prize in P. Then, it is natural to describe each of the two laureates in turn. Q gives details about Denis Mukwege, and R introduces Nadia Murad. S follows R naturally because it continues her story in the present, saying that she now campaigns tirelessly. This leads smoothly to S6, which draws a combined conclusion about both laureates.

Step-by-Step Solution:
Step 1: Recognise that P explicitly refers to this year s Nobel Peace Prize and connects directly to the theme introduced in S1. Step 2: Place P immediately after S1 to explain who received the prize and why. Step 3: Note that Q begins with the full name Denis Mukwege and gives background about his work, so Q should come next as the first example. Step 4: Observe that R switches focus to Nadia Murad, describing her as a survivor of sexual war crimes. Step 5: Add S after R because it continues the story of Nadia Murad by explaining her present campaigning activity.

Verification / Alternative check:
Reading the middle part in the order P Q R S gives a smooth narrative: this year s prize, then the first laureate and his work, then the second laureate and her experience, and finally her ongoing activism. This neatly leads into S6, which comments on the fact that the two laureates come from different nations. Any other order either separates the introduction from its examples or breaks the narrative about one of the laureates into disconnected parts.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Option B P R Q S jumps from the prize to Nadia Murad first, then back to Denis Mukwege, and then again to Nadia Murad, which disrupts the logical grouping of information.
Option C S R Q P starts with S, which presupposes prior mention of Nadia Murad, so it cannot be the first of the middle sentences.
Option D Q R S P delays the mention of the prize until after the examples, which is odd because we should first know why these individuals are relevant.
Option E R Q P S begins with Nadia Murad without first announcing the prize or presenting the overall theme of the paragraph.

Common Pitfalls:
A frequent mistake in sentence ordering questions is to pick sequences based purely on content familiarity rather than paying attention to pronouns and time markers. Words like this year s and today hint at the narrative sequence. Another useful strategy is to group information about each person or idea together rather than scattering it across the paragraph, which often reveals the only logical order.

Final Answer:
The correct sequence of the middle sentences is P Q R S.