Difficulty: Medium
Correct Answer: have been
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
This sentence improvement question tests your understanding of modal verbs combined with perfect aspect. The speaker is commenting on a past situation that was probably very difficult for the listener. In English, we express this idea with the structure "must have been", not "must being" or similar incorrect forms. You must choose the option that correctly completes the modal pattern "must + have + past participle".
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
When we use "must" to express a logical conclusion about the past, we follow it with "have" and a past participle: "must have done", "must have seen", "must have been". The structure "must has been" or "must been" is incorrect. Therefore, the only option that fits after "must" is "have been". The full, correct sentence becomes "That must have been really difficult for you." This expresses the speaker's strong belief that the past experience was very difficult.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Step 1: Identify the modal verb: "must". With modal verbs, we never use "to" or change the form of the following verb; we use the base form.Step 2: Recall the pattern for past logical deduction: must + have + past participle (been, done, gone, etc.).Step 3: Test option B, "have been": "That must have been really difficult for you." This matches the correct pattern.Step 4: Test option A, "has been": "That must has been..." is ungrammatical because "must" cannot be followed by "has".Step 5: Test option C, "been": "That must been..." is missing the necessary "have" and is also ungrammatical. Option D, "no improvement", would keep the incorrect "must being". Thus, option B is the only acceptable choice.
Verification / Alternative check:
Compare with similar sentences: "It must have rained last night", "She must have left early", "They must have been very tired." In each case, "must" is followed by "have" and the past participle. If you drop "have" or change it to "has", the sentence becomes incorrect. Applying the same pattern to the question sentence confirms that "must have been" is the only proper construction.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Option A, "has been", would create "must has been", which violates the rule that modals take the base form of the auxiliary verb "have". Option C, "been", removes "have" altogether, leaving "must been", another incorrect form. Option D, "no improvement", cannot be correct because "must being" is never used in standard English. The structure "must be" is possible for present time, and "must have been" for past time, but "must being" is wrong in both cases.
Common Pitfalls:
Some learners confuse continuous and perfect forms and may think "must being" looks similar to "must be", but there is no such modal combination. Others may forget that after "must", we always use a base verb, not "has". To avoid such mistakes, remember the fixed patterns: "must be" (present deduction) and "must have been" (past deduction). Once you know these, incorrect forms like "must being" or "must has been" stand out immediately.
Final Answer:
The best improvement is: "That must have been really difficult for you."
Discussion & Comments