In the following sentence improvement question, choose the alternative that best replaces the bracketed verb form. In the early 1970s we (had) the kerosene stove.

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: no improvement

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
This is a sentence improvement question testing your understanding of verb tense and agreement in English grammar. The sentence refers to a time in the past: “In the early 1970s we (had) the kerosene stove.” You are required to decide whether the bracketed verb form “had” is correct or whether it should be replaced by another option. Such questions are common in competitive exams because they evaluate both your sense of natural English usage and your knowledge of tense rules.


Given Data / Assumptions:

  • The time reference “In the early 1970s” clearly indicates a past period.
  • The subject is “we”, referring to the speaker and others.
  • The verb inside brackets is “had”, and the sentence describes possession of a stove during that period.
  • We must choose the most grammatically correct and natural-sounding form.


Concept / Approach:
When we talk about a possession or state that existed at a particular time in the past, we normally use the simple past tense. For example: “In 1995 I lived in Delhi”, “When I was a child, we had a small house.” The expression “In the early 1970s” is a clear time adverbial for the past, so the correct tense is simple past: “had”. Present tense forms like “have” or “has” would be incorrect because they suggest present time. Present perfect forms like “has had” or “had had” are unnecessary and unnatural here, because the sentence is a simple description of a past situation, not an action that started in the past and continues to the present.


Step-by-Step Solution:
Step 1: Identify the time expression: “In the early 1970s”. This fixes the time clearly in the past. Step 2: Recognize the subject “we” and the verb “had” as a simple past tense indicating possession. Step 3: Check alternative verbs. “Have” or “has” are present tense and therefore conflict with the past time reference. Step 4: “Has had” is a present perfect form used with the subject “he/she/it”, not with “we”, and also does not match the simple past context. Step 5: Conclude that the original verb “had” is already correct and needs no change, so the appropriate choice is “no improvement”.


Verification / Alternative check:
Try reading the sentence with each alternative: “In the early 1970s we have the kerosene stove” sounds wrong because the time is fully in the past. “In the early 1970s we has the kerosene stove” is both grammatically wrong (subject-verb disagreement) and tense-wise incorrect. “In the early 1970s we has had the kerosene stove” is unnatural and ungrammatical. The original sentence, “In the early 1970s we had the kerosene stove”, is simple, clear, and grammatically correct, confirming that there is no need for improvement.


Why Other Options Are Wrong:
“Have” suggests present time, not consistent with “In the early 1970s”.
“Has” is present tense and also mismatches the plural subject “we”.
“Has had” combines present and past but still conflicts with the clear past time reference and subject agreement.
“Had had” is a past perfect form usually used when there are two past actions, one earlier than the other. Here we only have one simple past situation, so past perfect is unnecessary.


Common Pitfalls:
Students sometimes overuse perfect tenses because they look advanced, but simple past is actually the correct choice for a single, completed past situation. Another common mistake is ignoring the time expression at the beginning of the sentence. Always pay attention to time markers like “yesterday”, “last year”, or “in 2010” before deciding the tense. Remember that “no improvement” is a valid choice whenever the original sentence is already grammatically correct and natural.


Final Answer:
The correct choice is “no improvement”, because “had” in the original sentence is already correct.

More Questions from English

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion