Is SELECT–FROM–WHERE the fundamental template of SQL SELECT statements (with optional GROUP BY, HAVING, ORDER BY, etc.)?

Introduction / Context:
Understanding the canonical structure of SQL SELECT helps in composing queries and reading execution plans.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Basic clauses: SELECT (projection), FROM (source tables/views), WHERE (row filtering).
• Optional clauses include GROUP BY, HAVING, ORDER BY, LIMIT/OFFSET (vendor-specific).
• JOINs are expressed within FROM (and sometimes with explicit JOIN syntax).

Concept / Approach:
Most SELECT statements can be expressed as: SELECT ... FROM ... WHERE ..., with optional grouping and ordering. This pattern underpins both simple and complex queries.

Step-by-Step Solution:
Identify core roles: SELECT determines columns/expressions.FROM identifies data sources and join conditions.WHERE filters rows before aggregation.Add optional clauses as needed for grouping and ordering.

Verification / Alternative check:
Try rewriting typical queries into this template; it holds broadly across RDBMSs.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:
WHERE is central to filtering and is not illegal. Vendor systems implement ANSI-style SELECT–FROM–WHERE with extensions rather than replacement.

Common Pitfalls:
Misplacing filters in HAVING instead of WHERE when not aggregating; confusing join predicates with WHERE filters in legacy comma-joins.

Final Answer:
Applies — SELECT–FROM–WHERE forms the core of SELECT queries