In SAP, what is the difference between transaction codes SE01, SE09, and SE10 in the Transport Organizer?

Introduction / Context:
The SAP Change and Transport System (CTS) manages changes across development, quality, and production systems. Developers and administrators use transaction codes such as SE01, SE09, and SE10 to view and manage transport requests. Understanding how these transactions relate to each other is important for working with transports and distinguishing workbench changes from customizing changes.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Transport requests can contain workbench objects such as programs, tables, and screens.
• Transport requests can also contain customizing settings that are client specific.
• SE01, SE09, and SE10 all belong to the Transport Organizer family.
• The question asks how these transaction codes differ in focus.

Concept / Approach:
SE01 is the general Transport Organizer transaction. It provides a comprehensive view of all transport requests and tasks, allowing filtering by different criteria. SE09 and SE10 are more focused views. Traditionally, SE09 is used as the workbench organizer, focusing on workbench requests containing repository objects. SE10 is used as the customizing organizer, focusing on customizing requests. In modern systems, the distinction is partly configurable, but the classic interpretation remains relevant in interviews. All three transactions operate on the same underlying CTS data but offer different entry points and default filters.

Step-by-Step Solution:
Step 1: Recall that SE01 is considered the main, or expert, Transport Organizer transaction. Step 2: Remember that SE09 is primarily associated with workbench requests for repository objects. Step 3: Remember that SE10 is primarily associated with customizing requests for client specific configuration. Step 4: Select the option that states this relationship and clarifies that they are filtered views of the same transport system.

Verification / Alternative check:
You can verify by logging into a development system and opening SE09 and SE10. Both transactions show transport requests, but SE09 typically lists workbench requests by default, while SE10 shows customizing requests. SE01, in contrast, offers more general and combined views. This confirms that they are not creating tables, indexes, or users but are instead specialized views on CTS data.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Option B is wrong because database indexes, application tables, and user master records are not created by these transactions. Option C is incorrect because printing logs, managing background jobs, and client copies are done with different tools. Option D is wrong because the same transactions exist across system types. Option E is incorrect because SE01, SE09, and SE10 do not behave identically; they have different default filters and typical uses.

Common Pitfalls:
A common pitfall is to think that SE09 and SE10 are completely separate tools rather than specialized views of the same Transport Organizer. Another mistake is ignoring the workbench versus customizing difference when releasing transports. Understanding the roles of SE01, SE09, and SE10 helps you track changes correctly across the landscape and avoid transporting unintended configuration or repository objects.

Final Answer:
SE01 is the main Transport Organizer, SE09 focuses on workbench requests, and SE10 focuses on customizing requests, all providing filtered views of the same transport system