Robot layout planning: the workspace required for a robot depends primarily on the particular robot's kinematics, reach, and task setup rather than a fixed rule.

Introduction / Context:
Robot workspaces vary widely by mechanism (SCARA, Cartesian, articulated), reach, payload, end-effector, and safety requirements. Proper cell design calculates reachable volumes and keeps clearances for maintenance, fixturing, and safety systems.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• The question asks about the dependency of required workspace.
• Different robots have different kinematics and reach envelopes.
• Applications and safety standards influence perimeter design.

Concept / Approach:
Workspace planning considers robot reach envelope, singularities, tool lengths, part presentation, guarding, and collaborative/speed modes. There is no single “human vs robot” rule; a compact SCARA may need little space, while a large 6-axis arm with conveyors and pallets needs much more.

Step-by-Step Solution:
1) Identify main determinants: kinematics (arm type), nominal reach, and payload tooling.2) Account for application layout: conveyors, fixtures, safety zones.3) Conclude workspace depends on the specific robot and task.

Verification / Alternative check:
Robot datasheets provide reach envelopes; integrators simulate cells to verify reach and collisions, confirming dependency on model and task.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:
A: Sometimes larger than human space. C: Application clearly affects space. D: Fencing is not universal (collaborative robots may use scanners/limits). E: Even similar 6-axis arms differ in geometry.

Common Pitfalls:
Ignoring tool length and cable routing, which shrink effective workspace.

Final Answer:
Depends upon the robot used.