Removed sections: Sections taken from a feature and placed elsewhere on the sheet should be labeled and typically arranged in a clear, left-to-right sequence. Evaluate the instruction “arranged from right to left.”

Introduction / Context:
Removed sections are revolved or extracted profiles placed away from the parent view for clarity. Proper labeling and orderly placement help readers quickly correlate sections to their cutting indicators without hunting across the sheet.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Removed sections are labeled (e.g., A–A, B–B) matching Cutting Plane line labels.
• Arranging figures follows the general left-to-right, top-to-bottom reading order that maximizes readability.
• Standards emphasize clarity and consistency rather than a fixed right-to-left mandate.

Concept / Approach:
The goal is to minimize confusion. A left-to-right sequence aligns with natural reading direction for many locales and common plotting practices. Right-to-left ordering is not a general rule and can reduce discoverability unless a project explicitly adopts that convention.

Step-by-Step Solution:
Confirm that removed sections must be labeled to match their cutting references.Place related removed sections in a consistent, logical sequence to ease comparison.Compare the claim (right-to-left) with common practice (left-to-right or as-needed for clarity).Conclude that mandating right-to-left is not standard; therefore the statement is incorrect.

Verification / Alternative check:
Open any drafting standard or textbook: examples consistently show alphabetical labeling and intuitive placement, often left-to-right for readability.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:
“Correct” contradicts typical guidance. Claims about metric drawings, plot orientation, or third-angle projection do not change the core guidance: prioritize clarity; there is no universal right-to-left requirement.

Common Pitfalls:
Scattering removed sections; failing to label views; flipping the reading order without a clear rationale.

Final Answer:
Incorrect