Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: Recursive relationship
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
In entity relationship modeling, not all relationships connect two different entity types. Sometimes an entity type can be related to itself, such as an employee who supervises another employee. These special relationships are important because they describe hierarchies or self references within the same set of objects. This question checks whether you know the standard term for such self relationships in ER diagrams.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
When a relationship type connects instances of the same entity type, it is known as a recursive or unary relationship. In a recursive relationship, the same entity type appears more than once in different roles. For example, in a Supervises relationship, one Employee plays the supervisor role and another Employee plays the subordinate role. This is distinct from relationships that connect different entity types, such as Employee and Department, which are typically binary but not recursive.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Step 1: Recognize that the question describes a relationship within a single entity type.Step 2: Recall the special name given to such relationships in ER modeling.Step 3: The standard term is recursive relationship, also called a unary relationship.Step 4: Compare this with the options provided.Step 5: Select recursive relationship as the correct answer.
Verification / Alternative check:
Consider a simple ER diagram for an organization. If you draw an Employee entity and add a relationship Supervises from Employee back to Employee, most modeling tools and textbooks label this as a recursive or unary relationship. Another example is a Course entity where a course can list another course as a prerequisite through a relationship named Prerequisite that connects Course to itself. These familiar patterns confirm the correct terminology.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Option A, participation relationship, is not a standard term in ER modeling; participation usually refers to whether entity participation is total or partial, not to self relationships. Option C, standard relationship, is too vague and does not refer specifically to relationships within the same entity type. Option D, normal relationship, is also nonstandard and does not convey the idea of self reference or recursion.
Common Pitfalls:
A frequent mistake is to forget that recursive relationships still have roles, even though they link the same entity type. For example, a manager and a subordinate are both employees, but they play different roles in the relationship. Another pitfall is to assume that recursive relationships are rare or special, when in practice they are quite common in hierarchies and user relationships in social networks. Recognizing these patterns quickly helps in both design and exam situations.
Final Answer:
A relationship where both participating entities belong to the same entity type is called a Recursive relationship, which corresponds to option B.
Discussion & Comments