Relational vocabulary: in a relation, are rows sometimes informally called “records” (even though the formal term is “tuples”)?

Introduction / Context:
Different data models use different vocabulary. In the relational model, the formally correct term for a row is “tuple,” but many tools, textbooks, and practitioners informally say “record.” This question asks whether that informal usage is sometimes applied.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Relational theory uses “relation/attribute/tuple.”
• Legacy and practical usage often says “table/column/row/record.”
• The statement explicitly says “sometimes called ‘records’.”

Concept / Approach:
While “record” comes from earlier file systems and hierarchical models, it remains common in practice and documentation to refer to a relational row as a record. Therefore, the statement is acceptable as phrased (“sometimes called”). It would be imprecise to assert that “record” is the formal term, but acknowledging common usage is correct.

Step-by-Step Solution:

Verification / Alternative check:
Check database client software and UI labels; you will often see “records returned.”

Why Other Options Are Wrong:

• “Incorrect” would deny the widespread informal usage acknowledged by the statement.
• References to other models (hierarchical or object) are not required; this is about terminology breadth.

Common Pitfalls:
Insisting that only textbook terminology is acceptable in all contexts; in exams, read qualifiers like “sometimes” carefully.

Final Answer:
Correct