Bending sense and fiber stresses — rectangular beam under positive (sagging) bending: With a sagging bending moment, is the upper layer of the beam in tension?

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: False

Explanation:


Introduction:
Understanding the sign convention and where tension/compression occur under bending is fundamental to beam design and detailing.

Given Data / Assumptions:

  • Rectangular prismatic beam.
  • Sagging (positive) bending moment convention.


Concept / Approach:
For a positive (sagging) moment, the beam curves concave upward. The top fibers shorten (compression) while the bottom fibers lengthen (tension). For a negative (hogging) moment, this reverses: top in tension, bottom in compression.

Step-by-Step Solution:

Adopt sign convention: sagging positiveFiber strain distribution: linear through depth with neutral axis at centroid for elastic bendingConclusion: upper layer is in compression under sagging; statement is false


Verification / Alternative check:
Standard bending stress relation σ = M*y/I shows σ sign flips across the neutral axis; with y positive upward and M sagging, σ at top (positive y) is compressive.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:

  • True: Contradicts sagging behavior.
  • “True only for hogging”: Correct concept but the statement asked about sagging; thus answer remains false.
  • Depends on shape only / cantilevers only: Fiber stress sense is governed by moment sign, not just section type.


Common Pitfalls:
Mixing up sagging vs hogging; confusing maximum deflection location (midspan) with the sign of fiber stress at the top surface.

Final Answer:

False

More Questions from Strength of Materials

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion