Rearrange the parts of the sentence in the correct order to form a meaningful statement: Although no convincing P arguments were made against Q was commotion in the House R the amendment, there.

Introduction / Context:
This question tests your ability to rearrange jumbled sentence parts into a coherent and grammatically correct statement. You are given three labelled segments P, Q, and R that must be placed after the introductory clause to form one complete sentence. The initial part of the sentence, Although no convincing, is fixed, and the remaining segments must be ordered correctly. Such questions evaluate your grasp of sentence structure, clause ordering, and logical flow in English, which are key skills in reading and writing.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• The fixed starting phrase is: Although no convincing.
• Segment P is: arguments were made against.
• Segment Q is: was commotion in the House.
• Segment R is: the amendment, there.
• We must choose the order in which P, Q, and R appear after the starting phrase to form a correct and meaningful sentence.
• The logical meaning likely involves an amendment and commotion in a legislative House.

Concept / Approach:
To solve a rearrangement question, you should first try to mentally reconstruct the most natural sentence that conveys a clear idea. The phrase Although no convincing suggests a contrast, usually completed by something like arguments were made. After that, we expect the object of arguments, which is the amendment. Finally, the clause there was commotion in the House expresses the consequence that contrasts with the lack of convincing arguments. We therefore need to check which order of P, R, and Q produces the correct subject verb order and keeps the meaning smooth and grammatical.

Step-by-Step Solution:
Step 1: Combine the starting phrase with segment P. Placing P immediately after Although no convincing gives Although no convincing arguments were made against, which is a grammatically smooth continuation and fits typical English patterns. Step 2: Determine where the object of against appears. Segment R contains the phrase the amendment, there, which includes the object the amendment and the pronoun there that will lead into the next clause. Step 3: Place R after P to produce the sequence: Although no convincing arguments were made against the amendment, there. This matches normal expectations because arguments are made against an amendment. Step 4: Now examine segment Q, which is was commotion in the House. When we place Q after R, we obtain: Although no convincing arguments were made against the amendment, there was commotion in the House. This is a fully correct, meaningful sentence. Step 5: Check alternative orders such as RPQ or QRP. For example, RPQ would lead to Although no convincing the amendment, there arguments were made against was commotion in the House, which is clearly ungrammatical. Step 6: Therefore, the correct order of segments is P followed by R followed by Q, that is, PRQ.

Verification / Alternative Check:
You can verify the answer by reading the reconstructed sentence in one stretch: Although no convincing arguments were made against the amendment, there was commotion in the House. This sentence contains a clear concessive clause starting with Although and a main clause there was commotion in the House. The contrast between no convincing arguments and commotion is logical and coherent. The subject and verb pairs arguments were, there was, and the object the amendment are all in appropriate positions. If you test any other sequence, you will immediately notice broken phrases, misplaced verbs, or objects without proper prepositions, which confirms that PRQ is the only sequence that yields a correct sentence.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Option a, RPQ, produces an ungrammatical order where the amendment appears directly after Although no convincing, which breaks the natural flow and leaves arguments were made against in an incorrect position.
Option b, QRP, starts with was commotion in the House immediately after Although no convincing, leaving the phrase arguments were made against the amendment without proper placement, which distorts meaning and grammar.
Option d, QPR, also disrupts the logical connection between arguments were made against and the amendment, and yields a sentence that does not read smoothly in standard English.

Common Pitfalls:
A common mistake is to focus only on local grammatical correctness inside each segment and ignore how segments connect to each other. Learners sometimes choose an order like QRP because they see was commotion in the House as a complete clause and attach it too early. Another pitfall is not paying attention to prepositions and their objects. The preposition against strongly signals that it should be followed by the amendment, not separated from it. To avoid such errors, always identify the key verb phrases and their objects before finalising the order of segments.

Final Answer:
The correct logical and grammatical order of the segments is P R Q, so the correct answer is PRQ, which corresponds to option c.