Assumption I is implicit as the govt's moves are generally aimed at protecting the interests of the masses. But II is not implicit because of "any other way". There might be other means of gambling which the govt does not consider significantly detrimental for the people.
I is implicit from the need of different types of letter on different occasion II is implicit from "official" and "semi - official".
I is implicit because only then the person checking can check the availability, But II is not implicit. Personal details are generally required at the time of booking tickets.
I is not an assumption because there may be server reasons for the preference being stated. II is implicit because you ask someone to employ a means only when you assume that the means is available.
I is implicit in the need for training. But II takes things to an extreme with the phrase "no skill sets".
It is not implicit that legal mining does not harm and illegal mining does all harm. It harmful for the environment. This happens because norms are flouted with impunity in illegal mining.
If the govt has taken the decision. It must have assumed that its implementation would be possible II would not be is implicit because of "produced in the country" it is possible that the govt has import on its mind for the said purpose.
I is implicit in the norm prescribed in the sentence. This is why checking is being advised. Again, what would the banks check? Obviously, what the clients reveal. Banks would assume the revelation to be true. Hence I is not implicit. However , II is vague. If cross-checking is what the speaker has in mind II would become implicit.
The statement does not give any clue to the use of language. Hence I is not implicit. II is not implicit because of only.
When we mention something to someone, we assume they know is meaning. Hence I is implicit. But II is not implicit as the details cannot be assumed.
Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.